Image Curation System
A visual review workspace keeps selection and quality decisions with each asset while opening the same collection to cluster browsing and related-image search.
Large visual collections become difficult to use when review decisions, quality notes and ways of finding related material drift away from the media they describe.
The workspace presents indexed media through a review queue and a separate retrieval view. Review state stays with the asset record, while visual indexing supports clusters and related-image candidates over the same collection.
The important boundary is logical rather than physical: review state is handled separately from the visual index, so annotations can be reversed and indexing can evolve without overwriting review history. Missing media and partial retrieval coverage can be surfaced; this evidence makes no stronger claim about review-write feedback.